August 13, 2009: Update: After submitting my proposal
to ConnDOT, I was informed that the use of color was not going to happen, and that the current shield,
they feel most represents the suggestions of the MUTCD.  I respect and understand their feeling on the
matter, and there is currently no plan to make any changes to state route markers.
I have one final proposal to offer on a CT Route Marker that maintains the elements of the current 
shield that are so important to ConnDOT.  Please see the pictures below the get a feel for it.
All 24" Square shields would use FHWA font in the the proper series for the width to fit in the square
with a 12" height, and the 36" square shields would use 18" high numerals as are the standard in CT now.

I have to point out one thing that's interesting.  ConnDOT tries to follow MUTCD guidelines as closely
as possible, but the MUTCD states that 3-digit highways should be numbered on an elongated sign
(so as it would be practical to maintain the use of Series C and D for fonts, and not have to use series B
which is very narrow).  MUTCD states that 3-digit signs should be 24X30 and 36X45, not the 24X24
and 36X36 square used for 1- and 2-digit roads.  Just thought I'd point it out.

Now would someone please tell me why the design shown here
isn't a fair compromise?  I mean heck, it's nearly as bleeding-boring
as what we already have, but at least it's unique to our state.

>>> HOME: Return to www.wytout.com

All content, photographs, and computer enhanced images created by and copyright (c) 2009 by Christopher Pelizari