JULY 2009. A Proposal: CT
Highway Route Markers Update
Sub-section: A look at my proposals for new CT state route signage.
The main page discusses the
purposes of these proposals, and to go into the reasons again here
would be redundant.
PROPOSAL ONE: Preferred
Proposal. A new state route marker that coincides with our
redesigned
license plates. IT SHOULD BE NOTED: The background coloring in my graphics
is likely too deep.
My intention is that the background would be a light blue to white gradient with
the same high-readibility
of our current CT license plates.
...................................................................Square
Shield....Elongated
Size 1.....Elongated
Size 2

PERTINENT FACTS AS TO SIGNAGE
CREATION:
All signage except for Route 182A (which is a special situation as CT's only
road requiring 4-digit signage),
shall use an FHWA Type-D Font in a uniform size. 1- and 2-digit signs
shall use a standard size square sign.
3-digit signage with at least one '1' shall use a slightly elongated standard
sized sign (say elongated sign size 1).
3-digit signage with no '1' in the route number shall use 2nd elongate size
sign, max (say elongated sign size 2).
Route 182A should use elongated size 2, and utilize an FHWA Type-C Font to fit 4
digits in the space provided.
This Route would be the only instance of Type-C usage, as it is CT's only
3-digit A route still in existence.
The sign background should be a reflective light blue to white gradient similar
to that of the CT state license plates.
The Sign elements should be an Icon of the state of CT with
"Connecticut" Spelled out to the right of the icon.
This should be centered on the top of the sign. The coloring should be a
dark blue. There should be a dark
blue border around the sign as depicted above. The digits should
also use the same dark blue color.
Please use the photos above as a guide to what route markers should look
like. Please see the next page
to see some computer generated images of what this signage would look like in
the field.
3-digit signage should NEVER
BE SQUEEZED onto square signs by using a Type-C or Type-B FHWA Font.
PROPOSAL TWO: Alternate Proposal, should PROPOSAL ONE be deemed infeasible.
The image
below depicts a simpler marker that could be used as an alternate to the
preferred proposal.
...................................................................Square
Shield....Elongated
Size 1.....Elongated
Size 2

PERTINENT FACTS AS TO SIGNAGE
CREATION:
All signage except for Route 182A (which is a special situation as CT's only
road requiring 4-digit signage),
shall use an FHWA Type-D Font in a uniform size. 1- and 2-digit signs
shall use a standard size square sign.
3-digit signage with at least one '1' shall use a slightly elongated standard
sized sign (say elongated sign size 1).
3-digit signage with no '1' in the route number shall use 2nd elongate size
sign, max (say elongated sign size 2).
Route 182A should use elongated size 2, and utilize an FHWA Type-C Font to fit 4
digits in the space provided.
This Route would be the only instance of Type-C usage, as it is CT's only
3-digit A route still in existence.
The signage should use a white reflective background. There should be a
medium blue border as shown above
with a far thicker top line. Inside the Medium blue background of the
Thick upper line should be a white CT state
icon with "Connecticut" in Light Blue next to it to the right.
This should all be centered on the shield. The digits
should use the same medium blue. Please see the next page to see some
computer generated images of what this
signage would look like in the field. 3-digit
signage should NEVER BE SQUEEZED onto square signs by using a
Type-C or Type-B FHWA Font.

SHIELD DIMENSIONS FOR BOTH PROPOSALS:
Currently CT uses a 24" X 24" Square Shield with an alternate 36"
X 36" Large Square Shield for high volume limited access
state highways.
-My Proposals keep the square
shields at the same
dimensions. 24"X24" for the standard square, and 36" X
36" for the large
square. This is MUTCD recommended size for 1- and 2- digit routes, and applies to
my proposals for 1- and 2-digit route numbers.
My proposals each use to elongated shield sizes for 3-digit shields.
-Elongated Size 1: 24"h
X 28"w. (a large size may not be necessary but if it were it would be
36"h X 42"w). These dimensions apply
to both proposals for all
3-digit routes with at least 1 number '1' in them. This interim size is
proposed for sign aesthetics only. This
size could be abandoned in favor of Elongated Size 3 in the event that 3 shield
sizes are seen as unpractical. see below.
In the event that a third
shield size is seen as infeasible, unnecessary, or simply too confusing to sign
making contractors, Elongated
Size 1 should be abandoned, and Elongated size 2 (described below) should be
used for ALL 3-digit shields, as Elongated Size 2's
dimensions are those recommended by the FHWA's MUTCD.
-Elongated Size 2: 24"h
X 30"w. Large Size would be
36"h X 45"w. This is the MUTCD standard shield size for 3-digit
routes. These
dimensions apply to both proposals for all 3-digit routes with no '1's in them,
and to special circumstance route 182A.
A Few additional large size examples of both proposals:








>>>NEXT
PAGE>>> Comparisons
of current installations, with side-by-side computer enhanced versions
showing the new
shield being used in the field.
>>> Pictures of current route markers
>>> HOME: Return to www.wytout.com
All content, photographs, and computer enhanced images created by and copyright (c) 2009 by Christopher Pelizari